Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3332 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of FX-8370
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $146.90 vs $351.41
- Up to 46% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-14900K - $0.69 vs $1.27 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Ready or Not than FX-8370 - 306 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €163.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
306
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
54%
Price, €
€390.07
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |