The FX-8350 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4820K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $25.10 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8350
- Up to 14% cheaper – $154.97 vs $180.07
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
FX-8350 vs Core i7-4820K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€180.07
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
87%
FX-8350 vs Core i7-4820K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4820K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $1.99 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge-E |
125 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
