Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of FX-8300
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $86.08 vs $229.44
- Up to 48% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 7700X - $0.63 vs $1.20 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 41% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - 213 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €95.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Buy for €254.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8300 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |