The FX-8300 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4930K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $41.50 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-4930K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-4930K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 43% cheaper – $54.05 vs $95.55
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
FX-8300 vs Core i7-4930K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4930K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
€54.05
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
FX-8300 vs Core i7-4930K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-4930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-4930K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-4930K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
95 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |