The FX-8300 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $174.74 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Up to 65% cheaper – $95.55 vs $270.29
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-10700K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8300 vs Core i7-10700K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€270.29
35%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
41%
FX-8300 vs Core i7-10700K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
