The FX-8120 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3500X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $42.32 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Up to 38% cheaper – $70.29 vs $112.61
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 5 3500X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3500X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
FX-8120 vs Ryzen 5 3500X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 3500X
Sep 24th, 2019
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€112.61
62%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
71%
FX-8120 vs Ryzen 5 3500X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Ryzen 5 3500X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Ryzen 5 3500X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3500X
Sep 24th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8120 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |