The FX-6300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-1620 v4, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $156.85 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 75% cheaper – $52.27 vs $209.12
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 95 vs 140 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€209.12
24%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
27%
FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
95 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |