In Battlefield 6, the FX-6300 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6300
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 95 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10980XE
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Core i9-10980XE: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
70%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
71%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Core i9-10980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Core i9-10980XE in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
32%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i9-10980XE
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10980XE Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $1,076.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2066 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
