Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4333 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6200 - 249 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
