The FX-6200 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-9700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6200
The Core i7-9700K is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-9700K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
FX-6200 vs Core i7-9700K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€211.91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
FX-6200 vs Core i7-9700K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
3-core
38%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
