The FX-6100 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900K, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $414.72 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 94% cheaper – $26.71 vs $441.43
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 6 threads
FX-6100 vs Core i9-13900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, €
€441.43
6%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
8%
FX-6100 vs Core i9-13900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
