In Battlefield 6, the FX-6100 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-8700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $160 cheaper!
FX-6100
- Up to 83% cheaper – $33.90 vs $194.00
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.55 vs $2.36/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i7-8700K
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6 – 82 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-6100 vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
61 FPS
74%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
75%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
82 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
17%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
