The FX-4350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-6800K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-6800K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-6800K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
FX-4350 vs Core i7-6800K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€70.27
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
FX-4350 vs Core i7-6800K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-6800K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-6800K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $434.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
125 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 15 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
