Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of FX-4300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $38.97 vs $250.79
- Up to 82% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-13700K - $0.15 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-4300 - 341 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €43.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
341
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
18%
Price, €
€278.38
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €278.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4300 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |