The FX-4170 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-2500K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4170
The Core i5-2500K is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-2500K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
FX-4170 vs Core i5-2500K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
€243.23
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
FX-4170 vs Core i5-2500K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4170 vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4170 vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4170
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4170 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
