The FX-4130 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11600K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $132.42 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 74% cheaper – $46.86 vs $179.28
Advantages of the Core i5-11600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
FX-4130 vs Core i5-11600K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€179.28
26%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
32%
FX-4130 vs Core i5-11600K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$112.00 | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
