The FX-4130 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Athlon 3000G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $7.22 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 13% cheaper – $46.86 vs $54.08
Advantages of the Athlon 3000G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
FX-4130 vs Athlon 3000G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, €
€54.08
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
93%
FX-4130 vs Athlon 3000G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Athlon 3000G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Athlon 3000G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| $112.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
