The FX-4100 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4100
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 95 vs 165 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-10920X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
FX-4100 vs Core i9-10920X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€539.64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.81/FPS
100%
FX-4100 vs Core i9-10920X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i9-10920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i9-10920X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Cascade Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 19.25 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
