Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms EPYC 9354P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 44 days older than EPYC 9354P.
Advantages of EPYC 9354P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900K - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Lost Ark than EPYC 9354P - 314 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 9354P - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9354P doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
314
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€450.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €450.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9354P | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |