Key Differences
In short — EPYC 9354P outperforms Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 9354P is 924 days newer than Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of EPYC 9354P
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - 201 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 9354P - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9354P doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
97%
Value, €/FPS
€2.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€472.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €472.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9354P | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |