The EPYC 9354 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9354
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 51 vs 280 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the EPYC 9354 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G3930 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9354
Nov 10th, 2022
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
170
88%
Min 1% FPS
114
89%
Price, €
€63.42
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G3930 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9354 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9354
Nov 10th, 2022
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
2 MB
1%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9354 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
$3,420.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Not Available | Codename | Kaby Lake |
280 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |