The EPYC 9174F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9174F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 145 vs 320 Watts
EPYC 9174F vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9174F
Nov 10th, 2022
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
181
89%
Min 1% FPS
120
90%
Price, €
€1711.71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.45/FPS
100%
EPYC 9174F vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9174F vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9174F vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9174F
Nov 10th, 2022
Cores
16-core
73%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
21%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9174F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$3,850.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Not Available | Codename | Broadwell |
| 320 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Performance | ||
| 16 | Cores | 22 |
| 32 | Threads | 44 |
4.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 55 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
