The EPYC 7702 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7702
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-11900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 65 vs 200 Watts
EPYC 7702 vs Core i9-11900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
181
89%
Min 1% FPS
120
90%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€225.22
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
EPYC 7702 vs Core i9-11900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i9-11900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i9-11900F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
12%
L3 Cache
16 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7702 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $422.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Not Available | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
