Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 96 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than EPYC 7642 - 206 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7642 - 120 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7642 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€671.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7477 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7642 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 16 |
96 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |