Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 96 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than EPYC 7642 - 232 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7642 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7642 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €229.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7458 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7642 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Not Available | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 8 |
96 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |