Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900KF - 96 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 7642 - 289 vs 255 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€375.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €375.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7481 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7642 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 24 |
96 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |