The EPYC 7542 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-12700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7542
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-12700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 65 vs 225 Watts
EPYC 7542 vs Core i7-12700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7542
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
87%
Min 1% FPS
120
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
207
100%
Min 1% FPS
136
100%
Price, €
€212.59
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
EPYC 7542 vs Core i7-12700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7542 vs Core i7-12700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7542 vs Core i7-12700F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7542
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
12-core
38%
L3 Cache
25 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7542 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-12700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $324.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 12 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 25 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
