Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms EPYC 7502P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7502P.
Advantages of EPYC 7502P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 9% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 7502P - 278 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7502P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7502P doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €229.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8059 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7502P | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Not Available | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |