Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms EPYC 7502P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7502P.
Advantages of EPYC 7502P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900K - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Resident Evil 4 than EPYC 7502P - 214 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7502P - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7502P doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€450.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €450.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7502P | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |