Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 7402P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 820 days newer than EPYC 7402P.
Advantages of EPYC 7402P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than EPYC 7402P - 336 vs 307 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7402P - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7402P doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
336
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6972 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7402P | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |