The EPYC 7401P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7401P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 12 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-11400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 65 vs 170 Watts
EPYC 7401P vs Core i5-11400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Average FPS
173
87%
Min 1% FPS
116
89%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, €
€117.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
EPYC 7401P vs Core i5-11400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
68%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7401P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $157.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Naples | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| 170 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
