Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms EPYC 7313 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 513 days older than EPYC 7313.
Advantages of EPYC 7313
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 155 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10940X - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7313 - 189 vs 188 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.60/FPS
100%
Price, €
€680.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €680.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7313 | vs | Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |