Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $243.61 vs $604.65
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.32 vs $2.92 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-9920X - 230 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 120 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
205
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€270.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €270.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.92/FPS
45%
Price, €
€671.16
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9920X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |