The Core i9-9900X is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $199.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-9900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Up to 55% cheaper – $160.38 vs $360.35
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 95 vs 165 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-9900X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i9-9900X vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€360.35
44%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
50%
Core i9-9900X vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900X vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900X vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-9900X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
$989.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
165 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
19.25 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |