In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900K is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 3800XT. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900K
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Jul 07, 2020 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 3800XT: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
85 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
97%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 3800XT in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900K vs Ryzen 7 3800XT in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3800XT Jul 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
95W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
