Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Pentium G4400 - 134 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Pentium G4400
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $40.53 vs $346.85
- Up to 86% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9900K - $0.36 vs $2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.59/FPS
14%
Price, €
€346.85
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €346.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 401 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
113
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 400 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900K | vs | Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |