The Core i9-9900K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $299.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-9900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper – $46.86 vs $346.85
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i9-9900K vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€346.85
13%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
16%
Core i9-9900K vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900K vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900K vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-9900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
