Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 2311 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-7920X - 556 vs 532 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $105.50 vs $260.53
- Up to 61% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-7920X - $0.21 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €289.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
556
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-7920X | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |