Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2028 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-7900X - 207 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $160.63 vs $236.11
- Up to 43% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-7900X - $0.86 vs $1.50 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €262.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €178.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-7900X | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |