Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1039 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Core i9-7900X
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $292.79 vs $472.97
- Up to 36% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $1.57 vs $2.44 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-7900X - 194 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
187
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €292.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.44/FPS
64%
Price, €
€472.97
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €472.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-7900X | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |