Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i5-14400F - 201 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $133.91 vs $351.43
- Up to 59% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900K - $0.79 vs $1.94 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
41%
Price, €
€390.09
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |