Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 3600 - 594 vs 540 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $84.68 vs $436.94
- Up to 78% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-14900F - $0.16 vs $0.74 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
594
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
22%
Price, €
€436.94
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €436.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7304 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
540
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7305 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |