The Core i9-13900KS is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4300, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $379.26 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Up to 90% cheaper – $43.26 vs $422.52
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 95 vs 150 Watts
Core i9-13900KS vs FX-4300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
243
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, €
€422.52
10%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
13%
Core i9-13900KS vs FX-4300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900KS vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900KS vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900KS | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$6.99 | MSRP | $1.22 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Raptor Lake-S | Codename | Vishera |
150 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |