Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 25% better in Valorant than Core i9-10900F - 1007 vs 807 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $377.48 vs $555.82
- Up to 46% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10900F - $0.37 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
1007
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€377.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €377.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 442 minutes ago
Buy for €555.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 442 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |