Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 107 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13600KF.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13600KF - 785 vs 734 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $162.16 vs $377.48
- Up to 54% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900KS - $0.22 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
785
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
46%
Price, €
€377.48
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €377.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
734
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |