Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1178 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3600 - 167 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $68.17 vs $323.84
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900KF - $0.49 vs $2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
23%
Price, €
€359.46
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €359.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
153
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |