Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-13900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 99 days older than the more expensive Core i9-13900.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900 - 587 vs 549 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $417.64 vs $432.43
- Up to 10% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900 - $0.71 vs $0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
587
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€417.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €417.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348 minutes ago
Buy for €432.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |