Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i7-14700F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700F - 222 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $219.13 vs $323.84
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - $1.12 vs $1.62 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
69%
Price, €
€359.46
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €359.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €243.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |