Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i7-12700F - 167 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $212.60 vs $417.64
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900KF - $1.33 vs $2.50 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.5/FPS
53%
Price, €
€417.64
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €417.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
160
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€212.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €212.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |