Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 99 days older than the more expensive Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13400F - 136 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $325.46 vs $730.45
- Up to 60% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13400F - $2.66 vs $6.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€361.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €361.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |